Community Investing - Making Capital Accessible (Part 2)


According to CCINC, a conservative demand by community investment organizations surveyed in the study is $750 million over two years. Growth opportunities that were identified included; business succession; social enterprise, including buyouts and conversion to co-operatives; housing development; and community owned energy. Early results from a financing demand study in Atlantic Canada by the Social Economy Research Network suggest the average social enterprise requires a minimum of $500,000 for expansion of programs and services including investing in housing.

Some of the common barriers faced by community investment organizations to finance projects include; lack of operational resources to enable deal flows; the need for training and capacity by project proponents; and rising costs of construction making it tougher and tougher to build affordable housing.

It is clear that community investment is growing in Canada and that there is continued demand for financing. How will we ensure its growth? The 2009 CCINC report entitled Building Local Assets: Community Investment in Canada provides the following recommendations:

  • Improve research of the sector. Further develop the community investment scan. Develop an industry standard template to increase adoption and increase response rates. If at all possible, bring on Statistics Canada. As part of this effort, a digital catalogue of community investment organizations should be developed.
  • Develop a hybrid model - an urban based CF. To move capital you need adequate staff resources. Is there a way to marry the CF concept with urban-based loan funds? Combine CF operational resources and the support of a national network with the ability of community loan funds to raise private capital and finance more diverse activities.
  • Attract private capital. Use incentives like tax credits and guarantees, after the example of the CEDIF. Promote it as a public agenda. (Now is a good time, given the ethical beating that mainstream investment is taking). Explore Program-Related Investments and develop the reassurance that foundations need to start placing capital in community funds.
  • Invest in housing and nonprofit commercial space. Look at the few under-priced but expanding housing markets where equity can be developed and assets grown. Look at the real opportunity to build affordable home ownership units in combination with nonprofit office space to enable asset accumulation by individuals and nonprofits.
  • Crack the business succession vacuum with social enterprise conversions. Succession planning is a huge issue in rural communities and may be ripe for worker co-operative conversion.
  • Develop a national community investment framework that puts forth a concise, forward-thinking document that identifies opportunities for growth and the real returns to families, communities, and to the Canadian government. This will include convening roundtables and rationalizing the sector through mergers between leading organizations.
  • Expand opportunity with credit unions. Credit unions are in over 1700 Canadian communities. This is a great network through which to expand community investment. The Nova Scotia Co-operative Development Council provides a great example for aggressive program development in this area.
  • Facilitate sharing and adoption of leading practices in the field from each slice of the sector: community funds; credit unions; Community Futures; and equity investment opportunities like the CEDIFs. CEDTAP was a wonderful resource. We need to be able to share knowledge at a better pace with a similar vehicle..

With enhanced private investment incentives, the deliberate sharing of practices, merging of structures, and provision of an appropriate level of operational resources, the sector could generate even more investment in Canadian communities. In an economic downturn that many people see as being caused by the excess of the marketplace, there is a big opportunity to educate the public on community based investing, to promote investing for blended returns. Socialfinance.ca is a great resource. We also need to be hitting the streets, talking it up with potential investors and to our local MPs about tax incentives and great models. Think big about projects that have impact for your community. How can community investment make the project work, and how can your local investor and MP help. This is the time. So let’s get out there!

I look forward to your comments where I can elaborate on innovative deals and maybe more in depth profiling of some of the institutions involved.


Entries in this Series

This social finance blog series intends to engage people interested in the field of social finance to discuss its complexities, challenges and opportunities online. The series will feature commentary from Ashoka Canada Fellows, social entrepreneurs and practitioners and key enablers of the Canadian non-profit sector including representatives of funding organizations.

How can you get involved?

Other Posts in the Social Finance Series

Comments

I’m interested in developing new investment opportunities for the Socially Responsible Investor - someone who is already attuned to the ‘money for meaning’ concept. I think it is possible to develop a bond mechanism to support a ‘well-qualified’ non-profit project where the money would be repaid in full with a return of 4-5% after a 5 year investment. A proper business model applied to the non-profit would be how this would be decided.

It is only now that the common banking and investment returns are so low that this would be considered. Previoulsy such a low return over 5 years was of no interest but creating a bond mechanism, with something like a venture capital model should work.

If anyone is all ready working on this, I’d be interested in hearing from them.

Prince Edward Island will become the second Canadian province to establish a Community Economic Development Investment Fund (CEDIF) program to encourage investment in community-based businesses, including co-operatives.  The Prince Edward Island Co-operative Council was instrumental in convincing the government to introduce this program.
The concept of CEDIFs was introduced in Nova Scotia in 1999-2000. The Funds are “pools of capital formed through the sale of common shares to persons within a defined community.”  Since the program was established in Nova Scotia, 42 separate Funds have come to manage over $32 million in assets thanks to investments by nearly 5,000 Nova Scotians. The PEI government is developing a made-in-PEI CEDIF model based on the Nova Scotia program, which will encourage investments in rural areas.
The CEDIF program was part of PEI’s new Rural Action Plan, which was announced on January 26.  For more information, go to http://www.gov.pe.ca/go/ruralactionplan.

CCINC will be looking into creating a model fund of its members over the next few months, so there is an opportunity to talk with us on that.

The SIO also has this RFP out:

Social Investment Organization: Request for Proposals - Research on Impact Investing Vehicle

The Social Investment Organization is seeking proposals for a consulting assignment to conduct research into the creation of an investment offering to finance social enterprise in Ontario. Consultants may submit proposals on either or both of the research areas, which are described in the RFP below. The goal of the project is to determine the requirements for financing social enterprises in Ontario, and to establish a province-wide or national investment offering that would provide financing to social enterprise initiatives.

The RFP document is available here.

Deadline for proposals: January 29, 2009, and work is expected to begin shortly thereafter.

To respond, or for further information: Eugene Ellmen, Executive Director Social Investment Organization 416-461-6042 416-461-6042 ext. 111, ellmen(at)socialinvestment.ca

I have a completely different approach to the idea of social capital. First and foremost I believe that we should organize ourselves around concepts that generate capital. For myself I selected as a starting point real estate development in particular housing. By acting in a manner that links purchasers directly to the opportunity to develop and buy their own home we are able to focus on producing cost effective homes that cost $60,000 less then a comparably sized home in the private sector in our market. The difference between the cost of production and the market value is given to the purchaser as part of there down payment but must be repaid upon resale. The pool of funding created this way in the last decade in one City has been $50 million. see http://www.optionsforhomes.ca

If we organize ourselves in this way we will begin to creat our own pools of funds and thus set our own lending rules. Using a similar approach to green energy, that is, by allowing individuals to invest directly into a green energy development without any middleman fees we are able to offer an investment opportunity at 5% interest increasing by the inflation rate in electricity for a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 20 years. We have had two presentations so far to 60 individuals and have raised $500,000.

My key point is that doing it ourselves will build an independent self supporting sector that will not have to spend all its time explaining itself to investment organizations that generally do not get it.  We will instead be building businesses that we finance ourselves that can begin to address some of society’s biggest issues.

Michel Labbe
President
Options For Homes Non-profit Corporation

Tina,

Your remarks about a bond concept are innovative.

They are also timely as we are currently exploring this opportunity with a crown agency in British Columbia.  The idea has been inspired by the work of Social Finance UK and the Young Foundation; here is a short overview of their work:

http://launchpad.youngfoundation.org/home/tip/tip-social-impact-bonds-and-social-value 

There is more information within their own websites. 

*I particularly like the alignment of incentives to outcomes in this model, not to mention the effective flow of new capital into the social sector.*

I intend to write a full post regarding impact bonds when our research is complete. However, please do not let this prevent the discussion from unfolding, do others have ideas regarding the utility of a bond mechanism for use with social ventures?




Please enter the word you see in the image below: